Would like to see more images - can only find one on the site. What I can see is atmospheric and eerie - all that blue. But the blurb talks about family pictures and that always makes me nervous. Need to see it in person really I guess.
A rather poor website provided by gallery, doing the artist no favours.
The painting provided drips with the language usually associated with nostalgia and reflection. My first point of analysis is prompted by the subjects interaction with the monument: this phallic protuberance rather dwarfs the female, as she tenderly touches the masonry (Flemish bond?)
Her attire is that of a eras past, the pearls signifying the middles class. Of course the painting is firmly in the lineage of Hamilton or Richter with a little contemporary northern european thrown in.
10 comments:
David Jones@
Eleven Spitafields
Princelet St
E1
Hey! new look blog, very nice.
Thanks AP
sorry about the deleted comments, the original one was posted 3 time :(
No archive though.
Would like to see more images - can only find one on the site. What I can see is atmospheric and eerie - all that blue. But the blurb talks about family pictures and that always makes me nervous. Need to see it in person really I guess.
A rather poor website provided by gallery, doing the artist no favours.
The painting provided drips with the language usually associated with nostalgia and reflection. My first point of analysis is prompted by the subjects interaction with the monument: this phallic protuberance rather dwarfs the female, as she tenderly touches the masonry (Flemish bond?)
Her attire is that of a eras past, the pearls signifying the middles class. Of course the painting is firmly in the lineage of Hamilton or Richter with a little contemporary northern european thrown in.
how to restore deleted blogs
...pearls signifying the middle class
You're cracking me up Prof.
Post a Comment